logo

35 pages 1 hour read

Richard Wright

Big Boy Leaves Home

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1936

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Literary Devices

Allegory

Wright’s choice of “Big Boy” as his protagonist’s name and his reluctance to describe his appearance or background in much detail suggests that the narrative is an allegory. An allegory is a story in which the plot can be interpreted symbolically in order to communicate a moral or political message. From this perspective, Big Boy may stand for all Black adolescents forced to grow up in the Jim Crow South. From another perspective, he may represent the state of all African Americans more generally as they move from experiencing subjection toward resisting their oppression. He is a “big boy” but not yet fully developed. With this, Big Boy’s willingness to lash out in self-defense represents a first step in developing a critical consciousness that can lead Black people to fight back and gain equal rights.

Allusion

“Big Boy Leaves Home” is filled with allusions—or implicit references—to Southern folk culture, from gospel songs such as “This Train Is Bound for Glory” to folk heroes like Casey Jones. These allusions are filled with symbolism and foreshadowing. In the case of Casey Jones, Big Boy has a flashback while he’s hiding in the kiln to playing Casey Jones in a game. It’s a brief but telling mention; he looks up to this folk hero who was famous for speeding his train down the rails, a recklessness that ultimately leads to his death. Big Boy’s identification with Jones signals his willingness to take risks, even if they endanger his life. This also connects with the train motif and Big Boy’s desire to escape and steer his own train, regardless of the outcome.

Wright keeps the literary references to things that would have been familiar to his characters rather than gesturing toward “high culture.” In effect, he asks the reader to enter Big Boy’s cultural sphere and familiarize themselves with these references to understand the story’s full meaning. This approach does not pander to white Northern audiences. Wright intentionally refuses to seek validation for the community he is representing through analogies to outside sources of cultural authority.

Irony

Wright makes effective use of irony through the Epigraph that precedes “Big Boy Leaves Home.” It quotes several lines from a “Popular Song” that reinforces cultural myths about the American South: “Is it true what they say about Dixie? / Does the sun really shine all the time? / Do sweet magnolias blossom at everybody’s door? […] Do they laugh, do they love, like they say in ev’ry song? If it’s true, it’s where I belong” (16). This idealized outsider’s view of the South, or “Dixie,” is radically challenged by the ensuing story, which offers readers an inside, painfully realistic perspective of the southern United States. By the end, rhetorical questions like “Is it true what they say about Swannee? / Is a dream by that stream so sublime?” look not only naïve but even sinister (16).

Dialect

“Big Boy Leaves Home” is filled with vernacular dialogue that attempts to capture the rhythms, diction, and pronunciations associated with the communities represented in the narrative. This approach puts their voices at the very center of the story. Wright chooses to represent the speech of his characters in “eye dialect,” using nonstandard spellings to reflect regional pronunciations. Whereas many authors will vary a word or two to give a sense of vernacular differences, Wright uses nonstandard spellings for the majority of dialogue in “Big Boy.” For instance, Big Boy says, “Whut t hell! Ahma git mah cloes,” for “What the hell! I’m going to get my clothes” (29). The risk in doing this is presenting the characters in a way that makes them seem other or uneducated. Indeed, the history of dialect writing in the US did see white authors ventriloquizing Black characters in offensive and caricaturing ways. Here, Wright is writing speech from within the community where he grew up, asking the reader to adjust registers. It helps establish the authenticity of his portrayal and indicates a refusal to pander to the assumptions of the reading public.

Foreshadowing

The previous section discusses the symbolism of the train motif, which is used to foreshadow the conflict between escaping the South alive or taking the fast train into the afterlife. Wright provides other warnings of what is to come throughout the story. For instance, Big Boy is at first reluctant to go swimming in the creek. When the other boys invite him to come along, he responds, “Naw buddy naw! […] N git lynched? Hell naw!” (20). When it’s Big Boy’s turn to dare the others to take a dip, Lester mentions that “jus last year [Harvey] took a shot a Bob fer swimming here” (25). Big Boy then takes off his clothes and goads his friends: “LAS ONE INS A OL DEAD DOG!” (26). These lines of dialogue accurately predict the story’s plot points; the boys are shot at for swimming, and Bobo is lynched. Lester and Buck are the last ones in, and they lose their lives soon after.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text