54 pages • 1 hour read
Christopher HitchensA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Hitchens anticipates that some who aim to refute his claims in God Is Not Great will point to the horrific crimes carried out by secular organizations such as the Nazis and the Soviet Union. He admits that, just as good people exist in religious circles, evil exists among atheists. To him, this is a pointless argument, as advocates for religion should aim higher—if religion can only manage to be equally as evil as secularism, then there is no point in its existence.
Hitchens argues that although totalitarian regimes have been both religious and secular, totalitarianism itself is inherently tied to religious belief. The earliest absolute monarchies and dictators, from the Aztecs to the Egyptian Pharaohs, were almost always deified, and were usually religious as well as political leaders. Throughout the early history of the Christian church, the absolute power of God and the absolute power of human leaders went hand-in-hand. In the modern era, the government in Iran and groups like the Taliban claim complete political power while also demanding devotion to their specific beliefs.
Hitchens believes that the relationship between religion and dictatorships is so strong that even non-religious regimes become quasi-religious. He provides Stalinism as a major example. The Soviet state was officially atheist. Rather than allowing Soviet citizens the freedom of secular thought, though, this was intended to replace belief in God with a belief in the supremacy of the Soviet leaders. The same pattern can be seen in North Korea where, although the Kim dynasty does not claim directly to be gods, the leaders have convinced their populace that they are somewhat superhuman, and that Kim Il Sung will forever be the true leader even though he is dead. Hitchens describes the North Korean system as a corrupted version of Confucianism and ancestor worship. Ultimately, Hitchens believes that totalitarianism, even if it is not directly tied to an invisible god and even if it is explicitly atheist, is in itself a form of religion.
Chapter 18 outlines the history of skepticism and non-belief, a concept which Hitchens argues has always existed. Skeptics are rarely found in accounts of ancient history, he argues, because “they have in all times and in all places been subject to ruthless oppression” (254). Despite this, Hitchens details evidence of a number of historical non-believers, from Socrates to Benjamin Franklin. He speculates that many more examples exist who kept a veneer of faith to escape persecution.
In particular, Hitchens believes that there was a high level of skepticism among early philosophers and scientists. He points to ancient Greek writing that expresses doubt about Zeus being responsible for rain, and the persistence in the face of persecution that allowed scientists to develop theories about the cosmos and atoms. He focuses particularly on Baruch Spinoza, a Jewish philosopher who was condemned throughout Europe for suggesting that souls may not be immortal. Despite a lifetime of ridicule and hate, Spinoza continued to produce philosophical works and eventually became a major influence on European philosophy as a whole. Hitchens also references visionaries like Thomas Paine and Charles Darwin, who denied being atheists during their lives but whom he suspects were less devout than they presented themselves as being.
Hitchens ends the chapter with a history of Jewish intellectual oppression. He condemns Hanukkah as a celebration of a resurgence of radicalism after many Jewish Palestinians began to abandon devout faith in favor of Hellenism. The Maccabees, a group of Jewish fundamentalists, began a campaign to destroy this secular tendency. The group eventually allied with the Roman Empire, and in doing so gave birth to Christianity and eventually Islam. Hitchens mourns the lost potential of an intellectually vigorous, mostly secular Jewish community who might have ushered in a period of groundbreaking philosophical thinking. Instead, a fundamentalist monotheism took hold across the Holy Land, which Hitchens believes the world is still suffering from today.
The final chapter of God Is Not Great explores the problems that religion continues to create, even as Hitches is writing the book. It begins with a picture of modern Iran in 2006, when President Ahmadinejad announced the expansion of the country’s nuclear program. This event was highly religious; during the ceremony the president pushed a scroll containing the details of the program down the cistern where the mythical Twelfth Imam is said to reside, awaiting his change to return and save the world. Hitchens is at once worried about the idea of a religiously-radical nation having access to nuclear weapons, and angry at Iran’s destruction of the great Persian civilization in favor of fundamentalist Islam.
Hitchens sees an increase in dangerous radicalism in his own work, as well. He reports that instead of having civilized debates with religious leaders, he was often pulled away from writing his book to attend anti-fundamentalist events, such as the counter-protests in Denmark after a local newspaper’s cartoons depicting Mohammed became the focus of widespread rage. He expresses discomfort that in the wake of this event, there was no pushback by non-Muslim newspapers or leadership. He reports that most stated they would not republish the cartoons out of respect, but in reality they feared retaliation.
At the same time that fundamentalism is gaining power across the world, Hitchens sees huge advances in science and technology that further push religion into the background. He believes that it is time for a new Enlightenment, and calls for all readers to intentionally push back against claims that religion still has a place in the world. He writes, “Religion has run out of justifications. Thanks to the telescope and the microscope, it no longer offers an explanation of anything important” (282). Instead, the only purpose of religion in the modern world is to impede progress, to create unnecessary conflict between populations, and to control people for the sake of a powerful few.
The final chapters of God Is Not Great address both the history and future of atheism, and offers a counterpoint to the idea that religion is acceptable because secular totalitarian regimes have existed throughout history. In Chapter 17, he discusses a number of these regimes, and ultimately concludes that things like Nazism, Stalinism, and the government of North Korea are only atheistic on the outside—internally, they follow a similar system of leader-worship as that of the Catholic Church and other sects. When doing this, Hitchens follows a line of thinking found throughout the book: He dismisses religion in general and aims to disprove the existence of any higher power, but primarily frames his arguments around corrupt human interpretations of specific religious traditions. In his attempt to prove the unfoundedness of religion in general, Hitchens does not reconcile a point that becomes central to the book: that religiously-motivated problems are often centered around human use of faith to exert social and political power.
On occasion, such as in Chapter 18, Hitchens circles the idea that religion could possibly be a force for good if it is not taken advantage of by power-hungry leaders. He describes the ancient Jewish and Persian societies, who created robust intellectual communities with few restrictions on personal freedom. In both cases, he blames religion for the decline of these traditions. However, both the pre-Maccabee Jewish community and pre-Revolutionary Iran were highly religious, with most community members following the same holy texts and oral traditions as the more fundamentalist regimes that followed. These areas were not transformed by the introduction of religion into a secular context. Instead, they were taken over by groups of people who interpreted the already-existing religions in a self-serving way. This suggests that religion is not necessarily oppressive or antithetical to free thought, but that religion can be used as a tool by humans hungry for power and control.
When calling for a new Enlightenment, it seems that Hitchens believes this only to be possible if more people embrace and willingly admit to atheism. However, as Hitchens admits in his book, the vast majority of religious people in the modern world do not hold the same radical views as the visible few that have gained immense social and political power. Anti-fundamentalist activist organizations exist within many large religions, such as the Jewish Voice for Peace, a group of Jewish Americans who rally other Jewish people to reject Zionism. Ultimately, whether or not Hitchens is correct that the world would be better off without religion, the entire span of human history suggests that it might never disappear entirely.
Good & Evil
View Collection
Jewish American Literature
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection