53 pages • 1 hour read
Mohsin HamidA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: The source material and this guide contain discussion of child death, drug addiction, and sexual exploitation.
Prologue Summary
An omniscient narrator recounts the final days of Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan. He asks “a Sufi saint” what will happen to his empire and his sons after his death (3). He is given circular answers suggesting that his sons’ names predict their destinies. In the fight over succession that ensues, Aurangzeb, Shah Jahan’s youngest son, executes Darashikoh, his eldest.
The narrator then takes note of a trial taking place in the present day, wherein all those present are guilty—including, perhaps, the judge.
An unnamed, first-person narrator comments on the conditions of his prison cell. A guard hands him an envelope, and the prisoner recognizes the woman’s handwriting on it. He does not read the letter it contains.
The omniscient narrator reveals the details of a courtroom. The judge, addressed directly in the second person, presides, as associates of the accused enter: Murad Badshah, who is potentially a criminal compatriot of the accused, comes in first; followed by Aurangzeb, “the best friend”; and Mumtaz, who is cast as “wife, mother, and lover” (7). Others file into the courtroom, and silence gathers as the accused, Darashikoh Shezad, finally enters. The reader will glean that he is the unnamed narrator of Chapter 1. Daru, as he is called, has been charged with a heinous crime, and the prosecutor paints him as a remorseless villain: “He killed because his nature is to kill, because the death of a child has no meaning to him” (8). Thus, the trial begins.
The narrative shifts to Daru’s first-person perspective, earlier in the summer season. He is in the tricky process of trying to roll a hash cigarette while driving. He is on his way to visit a longtime friend, Aurangzeb, nicknamed Ozi, who has recently returned from studying in America. Ozi lives in a large house behind a gate equipped with security guards, prompting Daru to consider his own house, small in comparison.
Once inside, Daru and Ozi banter playfully—Daru teases Ozi about his hair loss—and Ozi introduces Daru to his infant son, Muazzam. Mumtaz, Ozi’s wife, is also there. Daru is nervous that he is staring at her too much; she is beautiful, and he admires her smoky voice. Ozi offers Daru whiskey—not just any kind, but the expensive contraband “smuggled in from India” (13). They drink together and talk about what has been going on in Lahore since Ozi has been away. Daru and Mumtaz indulge in a cigarette, though Ozi himself has quit while away.
By the time Daru leaves for home, he is quite drunk. He encounters a checkpoint and must stop for the police. The interaction is a delicate one: Daru is concerned that the officer has smelled the alcohol on his breath, and if the officer is a “fundo,” as Daru thinks of hardline traditionalist Muslims, he could be in real trouble (17). Daru bribes the officer and drives away with anger building at what he sees as hypocrisy and corruption.
The next day, he awakes, late, with a hangover and must rush to work. On his way, he runs out of fuel and has to walk to a gas station in the miserable heat. He arrives at work late, sweaty and disheveled. One of his clients is already there, and he demands that Daru explain why his check—for $30,000 in US currency—has not yet been deposited. In the exchange, Daru grows weary of the obsequiousness required of his servile role and suggests that the client take his money to another bank. He is subsequently fired.
After sleeping the rest of the day away, Daru realizes that he has agreed to go to a party with Ozi and Mumtaz. He tries to beg off, still experiencing the effects of the hangover and not wanting to talk about his job loss. Mumtaz talks him into it, and they drive to the party in Ozi’s Pajero (a Mitsubishi SUV). The party is packed, and Daru goes outside for some air. Mumtaz joins him, and they share a joint. Mumtaz mentions that Ozi has quit smoking hash, as well. She also tells Daru that she is a writer, interested in current events, and she reads him part of an article by Professor Julius Superb. Daru studied with the professor in college, so he is intrigued. The article discusses whether the legend of the phoenix—revived in its own ashes after burning to death—is a hopeful or tragic one. Mumtaz also asks Daru about his former boxing career, wherein he never won a title. They then find Ozi and drive home, without incident.
This chapter is a transcript of an interview between the journalist Zulfikar Manto and Professor Julius Superb, given during the trial. Manto—later revealed as Mumtaz—mentions reading Superb’s article about the phoenix as they begin, but what she is really interested in is how the professor met Darashikoh Shezad. Professor Superb says that Daru was a brilliant student, though “not the best at handling criticism” (37). Superb thinks that Daru’s work at the bank was beneath his abilities, but the two had lost touch before Daru’s arrest. Manto asks Superb why he thinks this case has attracted so much media attention. Superb suggests that it is the confluence of sensational elements: the arrested man is an orphan, and thus a sympathetic character, who has nevertheless been charged with a despicable crime, the killing of an innocent boy. There is also the whiff of corruption to the trial, Superb suggests, and, of course, there is the “purple” element of sex involved (38).
It is now May, and the heat is getting worse. Daru is smoking the last of his supply of hash when his dealer, Murad Badshah, happens along in his rickshaw. Daru buys some more hash—turning down Murad’s offer of heroin. Murad also announces he has a proposition for Daru; when Daru asks what it is, Murad withdraws a revolver and asks Daru to hold it. At Daru’s obvious discomfort, Murad seems to decide against pursuing his proposal and leaves. Daru returns inside to his air-conditioning to eat dinner and drink some beer. His servant, Manucci, has fallen asleep on the floor; the servant quarters are often too hot to sleep in this time of year.
Daru is awakened in the middle of the night by a phone call from Mumtaz. She wants him to accompany her on a trip to the city: She is scheduled to interview the madam of an infamous brothel in town. While Daru knows instinctively that the errand is dangerous—and not just because they will be going to an unsavory part of town—he agrees, excited by the offer. Mumtaz also reveals her secret to Daru: She is actually the journalist known as Zulfikar Manto.
Daru is allowed to listen in on the interview, in which the madam, Dilaram, tells Mumtaz her life story. She was raped by her family’s landlord and his friends when she was young; she eventually became pregnant but was forced into an abortion. As she was now without honor, she could not go back to her family, so she was forced into sex trafficking in the city. As she grew older and lost her clients to younger women, she began to help the landlord run the business until his death. Some people claim she poisoned him, but either way, she is now in charge. On the way home, Daru considers asking Mumtaz if she believes Dilaram’s story, but “something in her expression makes [him] think better of it (51). When Mumtaz drops Daru off at his house afterward, she kisses him on the cheek.
The following Sunday, Daru reluctantly attends the regular family luncheon that his uncle, Fatty Chacha, holds. While he loves his grandmother, Dadi, and extended family, he does not want to talk about his work situation or his romantic prospects. As he is leaving, he asks to borrow some money from Fatty Chacha, who unenthusiastically agrees to a rather large sum. He himself is a man of modest means, and Daru knows it. He feels guilty for asking and for taking the generous helping of leftovers that his uncle insists he accept.
The book begins with a prologue that hearkens back to the time of the Mughal Empire of the 17th century. The aging emperor Shah Jahan—of Taj Mahal fame—worries about the fate of his empire. The Sufi saint prognosticates that the shah’s sons will live up to the meanings of their names—names that echo among the characters of the present-day Pakistan in which the rest of the novel is set. Thus, it is foretold that Aurangzeb, whose name means honor to the throne, will prevail over his brother, Dara (killing him, in fact). This foreshadows events to come between Ozi, whose given name is Aurangzeb, and his onetime best friend, Darashikoh, also known as Daru; this friendship will not fare well. (For more on the theme of predetermined fate, see What’s in a Name?: Honor and Hypocrisy.)
There is also an element of uncertainty that underlies the Prologue. When Shah Jahan receives the head of his son Dara, a “gift” from his youngest son, Aurangzeb, he questions his memories of their childhood together: “Perhaps he doubted, then, the memory that his boys had once played together, far from his supervision and years ago, in Lahore” (4). Future events obscure or elide past realities; time and memory are slippery propositions, not always to be trusted. Daru’s nostalgia about his schoolboy days with Ozi is therefore also unreliable, as is the fairness of the trial. The narrator puts its impartiality in doubt from the beginning: “None present were innocent, save perhaps the judge. And perhaps not even he” (4).
The trial of Daru in Chapter 2 and the interview between the journalist and the professor in Chapter 4 are at odds with the realism of Daru’s first-person narration. These sections are, by turns, absurd and theatrical, often akin to magical realism or Kafkaesque farce. What is real and rational commingles with what is dreamlike and exaggerated. The judge is addressed as “You” throughout: “You sit behind a high desk, wearing a black robe and a white wig, tastefully powdered” (7). This deliberately implicates the reader in the proceedings of the trial; the reader is invited to “judge” the participants. In addition, the attendees of the trial are portrayed as a cast of characters, inviting comparisons to the theatricality of the trial, which in turn calls into question its legitimacy. The reader wonders if this is just a “show trial,” wherein the verdict is a foregone conclusion.
In Daru’s chapters (Chapters 1, 3, and 5), the reader gets a firsthand account of events; these chapters are narrated in a typically realistic fashion. While the narrator goes unnamed in Chapter 1, the reader quickly realizes that the man in the cell is Daru. In Chapters 3 and 5 (and beyond), Daru narrates the events that lead up to his imprisonment. Daru is immediately revealed as a character who engages in risky behavior: He is trying to replace the tobacco in his cigarette with hash while driving toward his friend’s house. He is notably nonchalant about this behavior—“Two drops of Visine and I’m set” (11)—as well as about the drinking of alcohol, which is a potentially greater crime in the context of 1990s Pakistan. Not only could Daru be punished for driving under the influence—alcohol itself is illegal in this Muslim-majority society. Daru rightly fears that the police officer who pulls him over could be a “fundo” (17), a pejorative term for a fundamentalist believer in the precepts of Islam, which forbids the consumption of alcohol. Even Daru’s drug dealer, Murad Badshah, will not partake of alcohol: “I want the pleasures of the afterlife. Charas [hashish] is a gray area,” he tells Daru, “but alcohol is explicitly forbidden” (42).
Ozi and Mumtaz, like Daru, have no such problem with alcohol, and their group of friends thinks nothing of drinking expensive whiskey smuggled in from neighboring India. In fact, Ozi has befriended a group of wealthy social climbers with whom he drinks at parties. These soirees serve to highlight the differences between Ozi’s privileged circumstances and Daru’s more modest ones. Still, this does not hamper Daru’s own tendency to render judgments on those less fortunate than he.
Accompanying Mumtaz to the interview with the former exploited sex worker turned madam, Dilaram, Daru hears not the story of a disadvantaged and victimized young woman who made the best of bad circumstances but a potential fraud: “Dilaram seems a little too well-spoken for an uneducated village girl […], and I begin to wonder whether she’s making up her story as she goes along” (51). This reveals more about Daru than Dilaram: his suspicion of those who succeed, his bitterness at his own limitations, and his potential willingness to falsify his own life story. This scene also serves to remind the reader of Daru’s penchant for risky behavior. He knows that spending time alone with his best friend’s wife—a woman he finds irresistibly attractive—is not prudent behavior. Indeed, the kiss on the cheek foreshadows future events: “I know I’m standing still, but I feel like I’ve stumbled and I’m starting to fall” (52). Ostensibly, this refers to his growing feelings for Mumtaz, but it is also clearly a statement about his character’s trajectory as he begins to explore Sex, Drugs, and Moths on the Wall: The Destructiveness of Desire.
By Mohsin Hamid