47 pages • 1 hour read
William CrononA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West highlights Chicago’s influence on the development of the American West’s natural and economic landscape during the 19th century. Chicago provides a metropolitan vantage point to understanding the story of the western “frontier,” and by the second half of the 19th-century Americans viewed Chicago as the gateway to the West.
The 19th century witnessed the creation of major modern cities, rich farmland, improved transportation, and vast markets. However, deforestation, species extinction, exploitation of natural resources, and widespread destruction of natural habitat negatively impacted the environment. Many individuals fail to see the relationship between urban, rural, and wilderness areas, often treating them as uniquely separate landscapes. The city and the country share similar histories and should be unified into one narrative.
The book does not address traditional topics of an urban study, such as the growth of neighborhoods, treatment of sewage and water supply, social conflict, or actions of municipalities. Rather, the book is about commodities and how economic and ecological growth have impacted North America. Commodity markets are essential to the urban-rural narrative because so few other economic institutions have impacted human communities and natural ecosystems to the same degree. Big city markets provide food, shelter, and clothing to its residents and are directly connected to the natural environment.
The narrative of the expanding American West complicates an understanding of abstract terms like “nature” and “frontier.” Scholars have adopted new regional definitions of the West that place its geographic beginning at the Plains or the Rockies. However, these new definitions diminish the areas regarded as “The West” in 19th-century America.
Cronon’s earliest childhood memories of traveling from his home in New England grandparents’ home in Wisconsin are characterized by the gray landscape, lack of vegetation, clouded sky, and numerous smokestacks welcoming people to the city. He is both fascinated and repelled by the monotonous flat terrain, houses lined up like barracks, litter, and shattered windows of the buildings on the south side. He recalls a neon flashing Budweiser sign as a landmark showing the way out of the city.
Once he moves to Madison, Wisconsin, he realizes that the Midwest’s plainness is part of its beauty. He becomes more familiar with Chicago but regards it as an “unnatural” place. It is crowded and artificial, and he prefers to stay closer to “nature.” Cronon questions the paradox of the term “natural” and what makes the second-growth forests and farms more natural than Chicago’s streets, buildings, and parks. The impact of the “human hand” on areas that were formerly prairies resembles that which created the city. Chicago’s factories and smokestacks emerged while the country was being developed into farmland, suggesting that the city and country shared a common history.
Cronon questions his ability to love the country and dislike the city, as one area is defined by opposition to the other. The definition of “city” is imperative to what Cronon and others feel for the country. His love for the country would have been lost if not for his dislike of Chicago to serve as a counterpoint. He began to see that the Wisconsin farms only flourished if cities like Chicago existed to sell the crops, and the city only thrived if the farms produced the crops. Drawing a boundary between city and country is a “habit of thought” (32), and disliking the city or labeling it “unnatural” violates his belief that human beings should not be isolated from the ecosystem that nurtures them.
Chicago is a point of reference because, for Cronon, it symbolizes the departure from nature of “The City” in contrast to his home in the nearby country. The city’s rapid growth and ability to consume the countryside invoked awe in visitors. The more people viewed Chicago as having the audacity to break from nature, the more awe-inspiring it became.
Cronon’s love of the countryside and dislike for the city is grounded in American and European romanticism. His early education distorted his view of the country and city, and he concludes that his life is more influenced by the city than he originally thought. Nineteenth-century teachings like those of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, John Muir, and William Wordsworth suggested that the wilderness was “pristine and unfallen,” and the city was “corrupt and unredeemed” (33). Despite some authors’ depiction of a murky, nature-less Chicago inhabited by cynical, remorseless people (35), like that of Hamlin Garland, others like English poet Robert Herrick presented it as a place to remake the land in humanity’s image. The city, therefore, provided escape from the family and rural restraints and, as architect Louis Sullivan asserts, a place to express the human spirit (41).
Cronon concludes that the city and the country cannot exist without each other. If individuals view the city solely as “man’s conquest of nature,” they miss the extent to which the city’s inhabitants rely on the nonhuman world (48).
Cronon’s Preface and Prologue underscore three important themes addressed in his book. First, it provides necessary philosophical context by questioning the relationship between the human and the nonhuman. Second, Cronon highlights the significant role that rhetoric plays in urban growth and the development of the American West. Finally, he provides a parallel narrative by presenting the historical rise of Chicago and the American West within the context of his own philosophical discovery of the relationship between city and country.
The question at the heart of Cronon’s research is: What is nature, and how do human beings fit into it. He seeks to explain how humans manipulate nature, and how nature manipulates humans. This raises the further question of whether humans are part of or distinctly separate from nature. These questions have been debated by scholars from biblical times to the present. The 19th-century context that Cronon provides is significant in that the views of nature at the time were rapidly changing. Pre-19th-century journals kept by explorers and settlers established nature, or the wilderness, as the antithesis of human survival, and that to carry out biblical scripture meant to subdue and conquer it. The Paradise Myth, or the idea that the earth would provide all the necessary sustenance in abundance and serve as a Garden of Eden, pervaded early American thought. The biblical passage in Joel 2:3 asserts that “the land is the Garden of Eden before them, and behind them a desolate wilderness.” However, mythological stories of grotesque, heathen monsters born from nature, as well as scripture itself, promised that the wilderness would pose significant threats to the survival of human beings. Creatures that howled and roamed the wilderness needed to be cast out. Indigenous people, as early journals claimed, were savages serving as the agents of the devil. Roman Poet Titus Lucretius Carus, in his first-century BCE work De Rerum Natura, asked humans to “consider now the wild beasts’ fearsome breed, Enemies of mankind by land and sea, Why does nature feed them? Why do the seasons bring Diseases? Why does death untimely stalk abroad?”
Pioneers, regarded as heroes tasked with the biblical duties of facing and conquering nature head-on, were championed for their willingness to sacrifice themselves for the development of their future villages. Establishing a nonhostile environment where villages could thrive was ideal. Conquering the land continued into the 19th century, when Manifest Destiny gave the president the right to force the removal of Indigenous people to the west of the Mississippi. Indigenous people were forced from fertile, valuable land and relocated to less desirable terrain.
By the mid-19th century these attitudes began to change. Cronon writes, “To see one’s world as a self-created place opened the doorway to heroic achievement, but finally denied any other Creator, be it Nature or God” (45). Writers and philosophers such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau presented the wilderness as a place where people could recharge and convene with a higher power. It was a Godly place, where people could escape the hectic life of the developing cities. The city, and specifically Chicago, represented two important views:
For those […] who feared Chicago, nature became the symbol of a nonhuman creation damaged and endangered by the city’s growth. For those […] who loved the city, nature became the nonhuman power which had called this place into being and enabled its heroic inhabitants to perform their extraordinary feats (41-42).
Rhetoric plays a powerful role in shaping attitudes toward 19th-century urbanization and nature. The power of 19th-century rhetoric becomes one of the book’s central themes, and Cronon uses the Preface and Prologue to lay out the necessary context. While Cronon highlights the relatively negative images of Chicago set forth by Hamlin Garland and others, he also notes that Garland’s descriptions invoke awe and wonderment. In literature, narratives of nature’s power to rejuvenate and bring change to communities characterized the works of famous American Romantics like Washington Irving, James Fenimore Cooper, Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Henry David Thoreau. These works of literature urged a new individualism and self-reliance by, as Emerson suggests, forging a relationship with nature. Through its idealized visions of the West, Romanticism became a venue for social commentary about industrialization, slavery, Indian removal, and war.
Lastly, Cronon invites readers to understand the development of the city in relationship to the country as one historical narrative. The idea of a narrative suggests the power that urban development in the West holds. In doing this, Cronon provides a parallel narrative of constraints, opportunities, and new ways of thinking. The narrative of the American West as one of hardships and symbiotic relationships between both rural and urban areas mimics Cronon’s own awakening. He writes, “If we are to take moral and political responsibility for the ecological consequences of our own lives, then we need to examine the link between the commodities of our economy and the resources of our ecosystem” (13).