59 pages • 1 hour read
Christopher R. BrowningA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Major Trapp is a “fifty-three-year-old career policeman” (2) and the commanding officer of Reserve Police Battalion 101. Browning presents him as an essentially decent but arguably weak man, affectionately known by his men as “Papa Trapp” (2). Although “technically qualif[ying] as an ‘old Party fighter,’ or Alter Kämpfer,” he has “never been taken into the SS” and is “clearly not considered SS material” (45).He also clearly does not approve of the orders he has been given and has to “visibly [fight] to control himself” as he passes them on to the men “with choking voice and tears in his eyes” (2).
As the orders are carried out, he refuses to “witness the executions” (57) because he cannot “bear the sight” and policemen remember seeing him “weeping like a child” and asking “Oh, God, why did I have to be given these orders?” (58). Despite this, he still carries out his duties, framing it as a matter in which he has no choice because “the order came from the highest authorities” (2) and “orders are orders” (58).
However, while he does not feel that he has a choice, he ensures that his men do, making them the “extraordinary offer” that anyone who “did not feel up to the task that lay before him […] could step out” (2) and protecting those, like Lieutenant Buchmann, who refuse to kill Jews. Trapp’s position becomes even more complicated and conflicted as he becomes increasingly numb to the murders and readily orders the execution of nearly 200 Jews from the Koch ghetto to make up his quota of retaliation killings. This is an important turning point in his development as it suggests that “the man who had wept through the massacre at Józefów […] no longer [has] any inhibitions about shooting more than enough Jews to meet his quota” (102). Ultimately, Trapp is a complicated and conflicted figure who adds complexity to the question of choice throughout the study. He is a weak authority figure who disapproves of his orders but carries them out regardless—and, eventually, even does so relatively easily—but still allows others the opportunity to “step out” (2) and protects those who choose to do so.
Lieutenant Buchmann is perhaps the most outspoken opponent of the battalion’s orders. At the massacre at Józefów, he insists that he will “in no case participate in such an action, in which defenseless women and children are shot” (56). He later declares that “short of a direct personal order from Trapp, he [will] not take part in Jewish actions” (76) and requests a transfer that he will eventually receive. Importantly, before he is transferred out of the battalion, he is outspoken about his objections and remains “indignant about how the Jews [are] treated and openly expresse[s] these views at every opportunity” (103). This receives “mixed reactions from his men” (103). Some make “disparaging remarks” (103) but others respect the stand he is making and follow his example in asking to be excused from such actions. Despite his objections, Buchmann’s position is by no means absolute. When Trapp is absent during an operation, Buchmann is ordered by superior SS officers to organize a firing squad. Like Trapp, he gives in to pressure and obeys his orders although, again like Trapp, he provides his subordinates with the option to refuse to participate.
At the other end of the spectrum to Buchmann is Hartwig Gnade, another lieutenant. During an early deportation operation, Gnade’s unit delivers Jews to Minsk as ordered, but once they learn that the Jews are to be shot, Gnade, “[n]ot wanting to be involved” (43), leads the men out of the town, rather than staying in the barracks.
This reluctance does not last long, however, and he quickly begins to show a “streak of sadism” (82), regularly abusing and humiliating his captives, brutally dehumanizing them and, in the process, being dehumanized himself. During one operation, he chooses “some twenty to twenty-five elderly Jews […] with full beards” and makes them undress and “crawl on the ground in the area before the grave” (82-83) while he “scream[s] to those around” to get clubs until they “vigorously beat the Jews” (83). When he takes command of a company at Miȩdzyrzec, this behavior continues, as he uses “whips on the assembled Jews,” keeps prisoners in conditions so bad that when they are marched to the deportation trains, they are “covered with excrement and clearly [have] not been fed in days” (108), and even introduces “one further step in the deportation procedure—the ‘strip search’” (109).
In a clear reflection of how much Gnade is corrupted and dehumanized by his own behavior, his first sergeant will later remark that Gnade “gave [the sergeant] the impression that the entire business afforded him a great deal of pleasure” (108). Like many of the men, Gnade drinks heavily, quickly “degenerat[ing] into a ‘drunkard’” (82) while in Poland. However, while many drink to block out the guilt and horror they feel about their actions, Gnade’s drinking seems primarily to encourage him to greater excesses of drunken violence and cruelty. Although the men are largely careful not to denounce their former comrades in their testimonies, Gnade is one of the few accused of open anti-Semitism and of being “a Nazi by conviction” (82).
Wohlauf is a young captain and a member of the SS. Although he has a poor service record and had received complaints that he “lacked all discipline and was much too impressed with himself” (91), Trapp quickly recommends him for promotion, claiming that he is “ready at any time without reservation to go the limit for the National Socialist state” (92). Although one fellow officer described him as “not a prominent anti-Semite” (92), it is readily apparent that Wohlauf sees Jews as expendable and as opportunities to show off his own power. The “pretentious and self-important captain” brings his wife to watch a deportation operation he is commanding, most likely because he is “trying to impress his new bride by showing her he [is] master over the life and death of Polish Jewry” (93). His men, who already see him as “quite pretentious” and mock him with the name “the little Rommel” (92), respond with “indignation and outrage that a woman [has been] brought to witness the terrible things they [are] doing” (92-93). In this contrast, we see how many of the men, mostly raised prior to Nazi-ideology-dominated society, are still able to “feel shame” (93) about their murderous actions, unlike their captain, who is so callous to the lives of Jewish people that he is interested only in his own sense of power and ability to show off his authority.
Like Wohlauf, Hoffman is a young captain and member of the SS. He provides perhaps the starkest example of the psychological impact of the men’s murders as he begins to suffer “diarrhea and severe stomach cramps” (117) that prevent him from attending his company’s actions. He blames this on a reaction to a dysentery vaccine but later finds it “more convenient to trace his illness to the psychological stress of the Józefów massacre” (117). The men, who already resent his officiousness, believe that “his ‘alleged’ bouts of stomach cramps, confining him safely to bed, [coincide] all too consistently with company actions which might involve either unpleasantness or danger” (118).
Importantly, this does not necessarily mean that he is consciously faking his sickness in order to be excused from operations. Rather, he has “the symptoms of psychologically induced ‘irritable colon’ or ‘adaptive colitis’” and his duties “[c]ertainly […] [aggravate] his condition” (120), which suggests that his sickness may be psychosomatic or a psychological response to the trauma of the murders. The most significant aspect of this, however, is that Hoffman does not try to use this illness to “escape an assignment that involve[s] killing the Jews of Poland” (120). On the contrary, he makes “every effort to hide it from his superiors” (120), only going to the hospital on doctor’s orders. This suggests that Hoffman sees sickness as something he is “deeply ashamed of and [seeks] to overcome to the best of his ability” (120), reflecting the prevailing idea within the battalion that finding the murder of Jews distressing or immoral is a failing or weakness.