69 pages • 2 hours read
Rachel CarsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Although much of the water in the world “is not usable for agriculture, industry, or human consumption” (39), people have managed to pollute or otherwise deplete the small percentage of water in the world that is available for their use. Thus water has become “the victim of [people’s] indifference” (39). Carson argues that it is only possible to understand the “problem of water pollution by pesticides” (39) in relation to the larger pollution of the environment. The pollution in water comes from pollution in all other areas of the earth, as well as from direct application of chemicals to water itself. The “deluge of chemical pollution” (40) in American waterways is so large that it is difficult to detect them and even harder to get them out of the water.
Carson articulates that one of the greatest threats to waterways is “the widespread contamination of groundwater” (42), which travels in between the water that is visible to humans. Nature, Carson reminds us, does not “operate in closed and separate compartments,” so “pollution of the groundwater is pollution of water everywhere” (42).
Water also poses a greater danger in regards to pollution because it allows for the mixing of multiple chemicals which may have been harmless on their own. Through these reactions, these chemicals can be altered “in a way that is not only unpredictable but beyond control” (44). Further, water is the source of life for a variety of species, so when the source is poisoned, the web of life is threatened.
As Carson expands her argument about the ways that chemical pollution impacts the environment, she explains that the “thin layer of soil […] over the continents controls our own existence” (53). Soil has a complex, longstanding relationship with the life on earth. Without soil, a large network of living things would not be able to survive. Through its relationships with networks of life, “soil exists in a state of constant change, taking part in cycles that have no beginning and no end” (53). When one part of this “interwoven” (56) community is targeted with a chemical insecticide, for example, the rest of the environment is also impacted.
As humans begin to understand the “impact of pesticides on the soil,” it becomes clear that there is “solid evidence of harm” (57). Relationships that had previously existed in a “delicate balance” are destroyed, meaning that “potentially harmful organisms, formerly held in check, could escape from their natural controls and rise to pest status” (57). It is critical, Carson argues, to more thoroughly understand how the soil and the organisms that rely on it, including plants and bacteria, are impacted by pesticide application.
In this chapter, Carson expands her argument from the soil and water to the plants that make up the “green mantle” (63) of the earth. Humans tend to destroy whole species of plans simply because “they happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time” or because they are “associates of […] unwanted plants” (64). This narrow focus causes humans to threaten the larger web of life that these plants are a part of. Carson gives the example of the sagebrush lands in the western United States, where the ecosystem was irreversibly damaged by the choice to eradicate sage, which “ripped apart” the rest of the “fabric of life” (67). These kinds of effects also cause one of the most significant consequences of the destruction of plants: the elimination of “the last sanctuaries of […] pollinating insects” (73) and the habitats of many wild animals.
Carson describes the method of selective spraying, which could more effectively manage unwanted plants without such widespread, harmful effects. Further, models of biological control, where nature “herself has met” (81) these problems and adjusted. Finally, utilizing “plant-eating insects” (83) is another form of potential control of plant species with much less harmful impacts.
Carson lays the groundwork for much of her more complex arguments by carefully explaining the impacts of synthesized chemicals on the three central components of earth’s ecosystem: water, soil, and plant-life. When the web of life is threatened by poisonous assault on one of these, all other relationships in the web are potentially harmed. Carson utilizes specific examples of ecosystems where an attempt to control one unwanted species causes far-reaching damage to multiple other forms of life, including humans.
In these chapters, Carson emphasizes the narrow-minded focus with which people see nature. Rather than acknowledging the wider environmental importance of certain species or natural relationships, humans make choices based on short-term, personal desires. When humans attempt to control, for example, a weed that is undesirable, they often cause significant harm to the wider environment, including potentially harming themselves or other humans. Carson challenges people to take a wider perspective in order to avoid complete destruction.