49 pages • 1 hour read
John WilliamsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
In the summer of 1924, Archer Sloane is found dead in his office of heart failure, which Stoner believes was motivated by Archer’s loss of will to live. Finch hires a new chair of the English Department to replace Sloane. He hires a Harvard graduate named Hollis Lomax. Hollis treats his colleagues with ironic politeness and doesn’t accept any invitations to parties or other social gatherings. He doesn’t fit in with the professors’ culture at University of Missouri but is popular with students. Despite Hollis’s arrogance, he reminds Stoner of Dave Masters. Stoner is sad to realize he doesn’t have the social courage to make a friendship with Hollis the way he did with Masters. Stoner’s book is accepted for publication, which earns him a promotion with permanent tenure.
Edith gets a loan from her father to buy a house. Stoner is stressed about buying a house because even if they can purchase a house, he won’t be able to afford the upkeep or the taxes. Edith insists on getting the house so they can have more space as a family. They buy a house and work together to renovate it. Edith throws a house party, and, to everyone’s surprise, Hollis accepts the invitation. Hollis stays late at the party and gets drunk. Stoner finds a kinship with Hollis through his stories of spending hours on his own, discovering himself through literature. As Hollis says his goodbyes, he kisses Edith on the lips in front of everyone. Hollis becomes even ruder to Stoner at work.
Stoner enjoys having a house because it gives him the space to have his own study. But he has a difficult time keeping up with the finances the house demands. Stoner’s book is published. He is proud of the book, and although it receives good reviews, it is averagely successful.
In the spring of 1927, Stoner receives the news his father died. He returns to Booneville without Edith and Grace. His mother explains his father was overworked, working the fields even though he was sick. He invites his mother to move in with him and Edith, but his mother insists on staying in the only home she knows. Stoner makes more trips back to Booneville to visit his mother, and she soon dies as well. Stoner sells the farm, which earns him enough money to pay off some of his debt on his house to his father-in-law.
In October of 1929, the stock market fails, and banks swiftly fall apart. The failure of the banks is so dire Edith’s father, a banker, dies by suicide because of his financial ruin. Edith returns to her mother for two months, leaving her daughter behind with Stoner. Despite the work of being a single parent, Stoner enjoys not having to walk on eggshells around his home. Grace turns six years old. Though she often plays with the neighborhood children, she spends a lot of her time quietly playing in her father’s study while Stoner works. He helps her learn and is fulfilled by being Grace’s father.
In helping to teach Grace, Stoner discovers new strategies to bring to his classroom. He becomes a better teacher, and the text explains:
The love of literature, of language, of the mystery of the mind and heart showing themselves in the minute, strange, and unexpected combinations of letters and words, in the blackest and coldest print—the love which he had hidden as if it were illicit and dangerous, he began to display, tentatively at first, and then boldly, and then proudly (115).
He can sense his classes are going well and that he is coming into a new layer of his identity, a part of himself he wishes he discovered years earlier.
When Edith finally returns, she discovers Stoner changed and became more confident. She has a new haircut and style of dress, but Stoner’s more profound change angers Edith.
While Edith was with her mother, she looked through her childhood things and destroyed them. Edith wants a new life, a new persona. Her mother gives her the money to buy a new wardrobe. She joins a theater group and makes new friends. Stoner doesn’t begrudge her new social life because he knows their marriage is essentially over, and he figures she should try to find happiness wherever she can.
Just as Stoner plans a new book project, Edith abruptly stops spending time with her friends. Edith decides to retake control over her household. She forbids Grace from spending time in Stoner’s study, even though both Grace and Stoner love spending time together in the study. Stoner knows Edith is waging a war against him. Stoner is outraged and shocked when he overhears Edith telling the neighborhood mothers Stoner doesn’t have any time for Grace. Edith forces Grace to socialize more with other children, take piano lessons, and play with dolls. Stoner sees this is all depressing Grace. When Stoner confronts Edith about using Grace to punish Stoner, Edith points out Stoner will never leave her so he might as well leave it alone.
Edith moves Stoner’s things out of his study and into the sun porch so she can use his study for her painting. Edith then starts storing her things in Stoner’s new, smaller study on the sun porch. Stoner stops working at home and spends more hours in his office on campus. He stops working on his new book and spends hours in his office reading for pleasure instead, just to avoid his home life. With Stoner spending more time out of the house, Edith releases some pressure on Grace and Grace becomes happier.
Stoner is now a popular, in-demand teacher among the graduate students. Charles Walker, a PhD student, asks for special permission to be admitted into Stoner’s selective and already full seminar. Stoner agrees, but Walker comes in late and spends the seminar interrupting Stoner’s lectures and challenging his teaching. When Stoner asks Hollis about Walker, Hollis says Walker is brilliant and attributes Walker’s challenging attitude to Walker’s own self-conscious problems with his body because he is handicapped. Walker continues to interrupt Stoner’s seminar with irrelevant questions, but the other students laugh at Walker, and he eventually turns silent and angry. Another student in the class, Katherine Driscoll, asks Stoner to review her dissertation. Katherine presents her dissertation, and Stoner tells her it’s one of the best he has heard.
Walker presents his dissertation to the class after Katherine’s dissertation presentation. He spends the time mocking Katherine’s dissertation, which Katherine and Stoner both realize is actually a way to mock Stoner. The presentation is uncomfortable and offensive. Stoner tells Walker he’ll have to fail him, because his dissertation had nothing to do with his chosen topic and everything to do with attacking another student. Walker argues with Stoner and accuses him of being unfair to Walker because Walker doesn’t agree with the way Stoner interprets and teaches literature. Stoner suggests the graduate program is not the right place for Walker, offending Walker even more.
Finch calls Stoner in to discuss Walker. Finch and Stoner are still friends; though they don’t socialize often, they remember one another fondly from their youth. Stoner explains to Finch that Walker clearly did not do any of the reading assigned in the seminar and tells him about the dissertation presentation debacle. A new chair of the English Department is needed, and when Finch asks Stoner if he’s interested in the job, he assures Finch he’s not.
Stoner is put on Walker’s dissertation committee. Stoner is pleasantly surprised to find Walker has some great ideas he presents at his oral examination. But it becomes clear Hollis is coaching Walker through the challenging questions Walker doesn’t know how to answer. When it’s Stoner’s time to question Walker, he asks him simple undergraduate-level questions about English literature, which Walker can’t answer. Whenever Hollis tries to interrupt to help coach Walker, Stoner stops him. The committee deliberates, and Stoner insists Walker clearly failed his oral examination. This enrages Hollis, who is also offended when Stoner suggests Hollis is interfering on Walker’s behalf. The men argue vociferously back and forth. Finch ends the argument by giving an extension on the decision.
Finch counsels Stoner to give into Hollis for the sake of harmony in the department. Stoner argues he has a responsibility to the academy to prevent people like Walker who are not prepared to be teachers and scholars from becoming academics. When it becomes clear Stoner won’t change his mind about his vote against Walker, Hollis again becomes enraged. Hollis officially accuses Stoner of unethical abuse and prejudice against Charles Walker due to the latter’s having a physical disability. Hollis insists he will bring formal charges against Stoner, threatening his tenure. Finch finds this ridiculous, but Hollis won’t let go of his anger. Finch and Stoner wonder why Hollis is so invested in defending Walker.
Hollis punishes Stoner by giving him undergraduate freshmen composition classes for his next semester. Stoner considers applying for jobs at other universities, but Edith doesn’t want to leave Columbia.
In Chapters 6 through 10, Williams takes the reader through Stoner’s adulthood, marked by joys and challenges, as some lives in adulthood are, demonstrating The Typical Life as Meaningful. Stoner’s father dies after working on the farm. Stoner’s parents have trouble staying healthy because of the health issues caused by agricultural labor. Their lives are still portrayed as having meaning, despite their mundane nature. Beyond the health problems caused by manual labor on the farm, Stoner does not face unemployment and financial ruin with the coming of the Great Depression. The Great Depression ruined Edith’s father’s bank, which directly led to his financial ruin and his death by suicide. Stoner has less in comparison with his father-in-law, but the security of his job at the university and the lack of financial capitalistic hustle in the academy spares Stoner from the fates of some Americans. Stoner goes through all of this through the tedium of his everyday, and though nothing particularly glorious happens to him, the novel emphasizes The Typical Life as Meaningful as he avoids war, economic crashes, and his family’s fate of health issues caused by agricultural labor throughout his life.
In his adult years, Stoner becomes a more confident teacher, pursuing his passion for literature and allowing it to overtake some of the tedium of his life. His relationship with Grace is important to him; they spend silent but meaningful time together. Stoner’s relationship with Grace helps him figure out how to be a better teacher at the university because he focuses on her learning and learns how to teach his students in the process. This new version of Stoner, a confident teacher and a confident writer, appears as a major character development. This emphasizes the theme of The Life of Literature Versus the Tedium of Academia. With time and work, Stoner comes into his own. He learns to focus on his love of literature and ignore, in some way, the tedium that surrounds it. He attempts to pursue its vitality.
This brings Stoner’s downfall into focus, as the marriage to Edith becomes, for Edith and Stoner, more about the banalities of marriage than love. Edith is going through struggles because she is a woman oppressed by a banal marriage and unable to live her own life because of misogyny and oppression in 20th-century America. After her father’s death, she leaves her family for months; it is suggested she stays with her mother. Edith doesn’t seem to want to be a mother, and she doesn’t want to be a wife; she was forced into this by an oppressive society that pushed this expectation onto women. Still, Edith tries to persevere and be happy and tries in part to pursue her life outside of the house. At this time, women were not allowed to get a divorce because of systemic misogyny. This oppression that Edith faces makes her unhappy, and Stoner is unhappy in the marriage too. They grow further apart because their marriage is based on oppression and social expectation and not on love. This emphasizes the theme of The Social Banalities of Marriage as Oppositional to Love. His shift from the setting of the house to the setting of his on-campus office signifies a new focus on university life, which speaks to another theme. What little love exists between the married couple is completely swallowed up by the social banalities of marriage and life. The entire reason they were married initially was to satisfy social expectations, and the tedium of marriage only worsens this initially weak attraction to each other.
Stoner’s character development is thwarted by a student named Charles Walker and Walker’s relationship with Hollis, as the novel demonstrates The Life of Literature Versus the Tedium of Academia but shows the latter category winning out in this instance. Walker is unfriendly and doesn’t keep up with the work of Stoner’s graduate class, in Stoner’s view. In Stoner’s view, he comes off as arrogant because he tries too hard to use his intellect to subjugate and mock others (the novel betrays its ableist views in this section). Stoner is knowledgeable about the texts in his field, and he cares deeply about maintaining the integrity of the field; and he holds Walker accountable and does not welcome Walker into the ranks of academia, in his view because he did not work hard enough. Hollis, in Stoner’s view, turns the conflict between Walker and Stoner into a personal issue, although it is not clear in the text whether Stoner is indeed being ableist. Stoner, seemingly unassuming, may care enough about professionalization that he doesn’t give in to Hollis’s threats, the text suggests. The novel continues to emphasize The Life of Literature Versus the Tedium of Academia but shows the latter consuming the former in this instance to Stoner’s detriment. The conflict between Hollis and Stoner highlights the sometimes difficult nature of workplaces and academia and also shines a light on ableist views of 20th-century America.