59 pages • 1 hour read
Charles DuhiggSupercommunicators: How to Unlock the Secret Language of Connection
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2024A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Part 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Part 2: “The What’s This Really About? Conversation”
Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary: “Every Conversation Is a Negotiation: The Trial of Leroy Reed”
Duhigg explores the concept of negotiation in everyday conversations. He argues that every conversation involves a “quiet negotiation” in which participants try to determine what everyone wants to discuss and how the discussion will unfold. Duhigg calls this the What’s This Really About? conversation.
The author illustrates this concept through several examples. First, he describes how Dr. Behfar Ehdaie, a prostate cancer surgeon, struggled to communicate effectively with his patients about their treatment options. Initially, Dr. Ehdaie assumed his patients wanted objective medical advice, but he failed to ask what mattered most to them. With the help of a negotiation expert, Dr. Ehdaie learned to ask open-ended questions to uncover his patients’ values and desires, leading to better communication and fewer unnecessary surgeries.
Duhigg then analyzes the dynamics of a jury deliberation in the trial of Leroy Reed, a felon who was charged with illegal gun possession. The author highlights the role of a supercommunicator named John Boly, who skillfully navigated the negotiation process within the jury. Boley asked questions to understand what each juror wanted from the discussion, then experimented with new ideas to reframe the conversation and challenge the initial momentum towards a guilty verdict.
The chapter also discusses the work of the Harvard Negotiation Project, which transformed the understanding of negotiation from a win-lose battle to a creative, cooperative process. Duhigg emphasizes that the goal of a negotiation is not to win but to help everyone agree on the topics they’ll discuss and the rules for making decisions together.
Finally, the author distinguishes between two types of logic people use in decision-making: The practical “logic of costs and benefits,” and the empathetic “logic of similarities.” The author illustrates this point through the contrasting examples of Dr. Ehdaie’s patients, some of whom sought analytical data and others who responded better to compassion and shared experiences. Similarly, in the jury deliberation, John Boly demonstrated an acute awareness of the different logical frameworks at play, adapting his approach to appeal to the practical mindset of Karl, a juror adamantly in favor of conviction. Duhigg argues that understanding which type of logic is most persuasive in a given conversation is crucial for effective communication and negotiation.
Part 2, A Guide to Using These Ideas Summary: “Part II: Asking Questions and Noticing Clues”
Duhigg discusses strategies for engaging in more meaningful and productive conversations by learning to pick up on subtle cues and experimenting with different approaches. The author begins by citing a 2018 study conducted by Harvard researchers, who recorded hundreds of conversations between friends, strangers, and coworkers to determine how people signal their desired topics of discussion. The study revealed that while people often provide clues about their preferences, their conversation partners frequently fail to notice or act upon these signals.
Duhigg then introduces the second rule of a learning conversation: To share one’s goals and ask what others are looking for. He suggests four ways to achieve this: Preparing before a conversation; asking questions; noticing clues during the conversation; and experimenting by adding new items to the conversation.
Regarding preparation, the author cites research showing that jotting down a few potential discussion topics beforehand can lead to more engaging conversations, even if those topics are never actually addressed. He recommends preparing two possible topics: One thing that one hopes to say, and one question that one plans to ask.
Duhigg then discusses the importance of asking open-ended questions, particularly those related to beliefs, values, judgments, and experiences. These questions invite deeper reflection without feeling intrusive.
The author also emphasizes the need to notice nonverbal cues during conversations. Positive signals like eye contact, smiling, and backchanneling—noises that people make as they listen—indicate engagement, while passivity and lack of input may suggest a desire to change the subject.
When faced with a companion who declines an invitation to discuss a particular topic, Duhigg advises experimenting with new subjects and approaches. He suggests paying attention to the other person’s mindset, which may be more empathetic (as indicated by storytelling or jokes), or practical (evidenced by discussions of plans, decisions, or analysis). Additionally, he recommends listening for attempts to change the topic, as these serve as hints about what the other person wants to discuss.
Finally, the author encourages readers to experiment by telling jokes, asking unexpected questions, introducing new ideas, and varying their interruption patterns. By observing how companions respond to these experiments, one can gain insight into their preferred rules and norms for the conversation.
Duhigg concludes by reassuring readers that they likely already possess these instincts, but may have forgotten them. He suggests gradually incorporating these tactics into conversations until negotiating the true purpose of the discussion becomes natural.
Part 2 Analysis
In Part 2, Duhigg delves into the intricacies of effective communication, emphasizing the importance of understanding and navigating the unspoken dynamics of conversations. The overarching theme of this section is the concept of the What’s This Really About? conversation, which highlights the need to discern the true intentions and desires of all parties involved in a dialogue.
The author illustrates this concept through the story of a jury deliberation in the trial of Leroy Reed, in which a supercommunicator named John Boly helped steer the conversation towards a more nuanced understanding of the case. Boley demonstrates the power of asking questions, noticing nonverbal cues, and experimenting with different approaches to uncover what each juror truly wants from the discussion. This example serves as a reminder that beneath the surface of every conversation lies a quiet negotiation, in which the goal is not to win, but rather to determine what everyone needs so that something meaningful can occur.
One of the central themes in Part 2 is The Importance of Depth and Vulnerability. Duhigg illustrates this theme through the story of Dr. Behfar Ehdaie, a surgeon who initially struggled to communicate effectively with his patients regarding prostate cancer treatment options. Dr. Ehdaie assumed that his patients wanted objective medical advice and an overview of their options, but he failed to recognize their deeper concerns and fears. By learning to ask open-ended questions about his patients’ values, experiences, and beliefs, Dr. Ehdaie was able to foster a deeper level of understanding and trust. For example, when he asked a 62-year-old patient, “What does this cancer diagnosis mean to you?” (47), the man revealed that his primary concern was not his own mortality, but rather the impact his illness might have on his family. This anecdote underscores the significance of creating a safe space for vulnerability in conversations, particularly when dealing with sensitive or complex topics.
Another prominent theme is The Psychology of Connection, which is explored through the lens of negotiation theory. The author references the work of the Harvard Negotiation Project, which challenged the traditional view of negotiations as a zero-sum game. Instead, these researchers advocated for a collaborative approach that focuses on uncovering shared interests and creating mutually- beneficial solutions. Duhigg applies this concept to everyday conversations, emphasizing the importance of active listening and empathy in building strong connections. For instance, when Dr. Ehdaie learned to listen to his patients’ stories and concerns, rather than simply presenting them with data and options, he was able to establish a deeper sense of trust and understanding. This theme highlights the idea that effective communication is not about winning an argument or imposing one’s own perspective, but rather about finding common ground and working together towards a shared goal.
The theme of Navigating Sensitive Conversations is exemplified through the story of the Leroy Reed trial. John Boly, a supercommunicator on the jury, demonstrates the power of asking questions, noticing nonverbal cues, and experimenting with different approaches to steer the conversation in a more productive direction. When the jury appeared to be leaning towards a guilty verdict, Boly introduced a new perspective that prompted other jurors to start imagining alternative scenarios and questioning their initial assumptions. Boly also paid attention to the different ways in which jurors expressed their opinions, noticing when some relied on analytical reasoning and others on empathy and personal experience. By adapting his own communication style to match these different modes of thinking, Boly was able to connect with each juror on a deeper level and help them see the case from new angles. This example illustrates the importance of adaptability and creativity in navigating challenging conversations, especially when dealing with sensitive or polarizing topics.
The textual structure of Part 2 is characterized by a blend of storytelling, research, and practical advice. Duhigg uses a variety of real-world examples, such as the Leroy Reed trial and Dr. Ehdaie’s experience, to illustrate abstract concepts in a more accessible manner. These anecdotes are interwoven with references to academic studies and theories, providing a research foundation for the author’s arguments. The “Guide to Using These Ideas” section at the end of Part 2 offers concrete strategies for applying the concepts discussed, such as preparing for conversations by jotting down potential topics and questions, asking open-ended questions to uncover others’ values and experiences, and experimenting with different communication styles to find common ground. By combining real-life stories with research-backed insights and practical tips, the author creates a more comprehensive and accessible guide to effective communication.
The analytical framework employed in Part 2 is grounded in the concept of the What’s This Really About? conversation. The author breaks down this concept into two key components: Figuring out what everyone wants from the conversation and determining how decisions will be made together. This framework provides a structured approach to analyzing conversations and identifying the underlying dynamics at play. For example, in the Leroy Reed trial, John Boly used this framework to uncover the different needs and perspectives of each juror. Duhigg also applies this framework to Dr. Ehdaie’s conversations with his patients, showing how a failure to understand what patients really want from the discussion can lead to miscommunication and suboptimal outcomes. By providing a clear and adaptable framework for analyzing conversations, the author demonstrates how readers could become more effective communicators in their own lives.
Related Titles
By Charles Duhigg
