logo

68 pages 2 hours read

Doris Lessing

The Golden Notebook

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1962

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 6, Chapters 1-4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 6: “The Notebooks”

Part 6, Chapter 1 Summary: “The Black Notebook”

Anna witnesses the death of a pigeon in London, kicked to death by a man who claims it is an accident. Later she dreams of the incident, and the dream leads her to recall the weekends she spent at the Mashopi hotel. This recollection is recorded under the heading “Source” in the notebook. Mrs. Boothby asks the group if they could hunt some pigeons for supper; Mr. Boothby wants pigeon pie. Paul is the best marksman in the group, so he takes the rifle, and the group head out into the bush to find the birds. Along the way, they encounter an enormous pile of grasshoppers mating. Paul decides to pull apart a mismatched pair—a small grasshopper failing to mount a much larger one—and make a better match, according to size. The grasshoppers resist his efforts, so Paul impulsively stomps on them. Anna notes that these events occurred a few months before their last weekend in Mashopi.

Paul then begins shooting pigeons, one at a time. He expects Jimmy to jump up and retrieve them and then teases Jimmy about being a good retriever, as in a dog. The day is hot; the group is rather bored; and they are antagonistic. Paul expounds on the state of the African country: “This country is larger than Spain. It contains one and a half million blacks, if one may mention them at all, and one hundred thousand whites. That, in itself, is a thought which demands two minutes silence” (427). Paul upsets Maryrose with his talk of senseless death and his flippant attitude while shooting the pigeons. Jimmy flips a beetle into the jaws of an ant-eating bug; the bug tries to eat the larger prey and chokes. Paul rebukes Jimmy for upsetting the laws of nature. The group returns to the hotel with the pigeons, not speaking to each other.

Under the heading “Money,” Anna mentions that a magazine wants to publish her journals. She amuses herself by writing a parody of an anguished artist’s journal. She meets a “young American writer” (436) with whom she collaborates on expanding the parodic journal and having it published. They then write a pastiche of a middle-aged white colonizer in Africa, a sentimental and older version of Anna herself; it is deliberately laden with cliché and overly baroque sentimentality. The American sends it in to a magazine to be published, though Anna believes the editors will realize it is a hoax. To the writers’ dismay, they offer to publish it.

Anna pastes in a story written by the American, entitled “Blood on the Banana Leaves.” It is again full of cliché and overwrought language. The notebook concludes with pasted in reviews, from three communist-leaning magazines, of Anna’s own Frontiers of War. They are critical of the novel’s lack of emphasis on class; its focus on artistic expression rather than political “truth”; and its perceived “Freudian influences” (445).

Part 6, Chapter 2 Summary: “The Red Notebook”

Dated November 1955, Anna is writing about the continuing crisis with the British Communist Party. The leadership has become overwhelmed by bureaucratic concerns, some believe. She then pastes in clippings related to the Twentieth Congress of the Russian Communist Party, held in February of 1956. By the summer, her tone has turned decidedly pessimistic: “Not for the first time in my life I realise I have spent weeks and months in frenzied political activity and have achieved absolutely nothing. More, that I might have foreseen it would achieve nothing” (446). By the fall, she has quit attending meetings.

Part 6, Chapter 3 Summary: “The Yellow Notebook”

Anna’s novel-in-progress, The Shadow of the Third, continues in this section, but only in rough outline form. Ella continues to fall apart after her break-up with Paul; she moves out of Julia’s flat, and the friendship between the two women is damaged as a result. Ella feels very lonely. Dr. West suggests Ella should have an affair with him. When Ella and Julia do talk, they talk about the betrayals they experience at the hands of the various men who casually come in and out of their lives. Ella falls into a brief affair with one of her colleagues; he, too, is married with children. She decides not to have sex again until she is actually in love. Quickly, she becomes gripped by sexual desire. She gives in to her impulses and has sex with a man she meets at a party. He is critical of her, and of his wife. Ella finally “becomes completely sexless” and “decides to write again” (459). After a space break in the text, Anna admits that Ella is a version of herself.

The perspective returns to Ella, who goes to visit her father. He expresses a guarded love for her, and Ella asks him about his marriage. He is embarrassed, but admits that Ella’s mother was not sexually knowledgeable; this led him to have affairs with sex workers. Ella is frustrated and wants to ask her father why he did not help her mother, teach her how to engage sexually. Her father does not want to know about Ella’s life, about what “modern women” get up to (464). She asks if he ever read her novel, the one about suicide. He says that he did read it, but that he does not understand it: “You ask such a lot. Happiness. That sort of thing. […] Your lot—you seem to think something’s owed to you” (466). The conversation makes her think about a new way of thinking, of writing, wherein unhappiness is accepted in the search for something more significant.

Part 6, Chapter 4 Summary: “The Blue Notebook”

This section of the notebook starts with brief factual entries about Anna’s life and activities. Then it turns to an overview of her time in psychoanalysis with “Mother Sugar,” or Mrs. Marks. They discuss the purpose of therapy, as well as Anna’s conviction that this is a new moment in history, that women in particular and people in general are undergoing truly novel experiences. Mrs. Marks disagrees and continues to encourage Anna to write again.

She then writes about keeping her notebooks and how they help her to maintain her identity, an integral self. She records a terrifying recurring nightmare she has, a dream in which the destructive impulse is embodied in a fantastic creature or an old man or a sexless entity. It takes joy in evil and in the disintegration of the world. When she tells Mrs. Marks about the dream, the analyst insists that it is a dream about creation, about writing; if Anna can overcome her fear, she will be able to see the purpose of the dream. She notes that she feels herself changing.

Anna then records a meeting of the British Communist Party, wherein there is a struggle over whether to tell the truth about the Soviet Union or not. She feels the same destructive energy at the meeting that she experiences in her dream. She also talks about an affair she conducts with an American, Nelson, who is married. She attends a party he hosts, along with his wife, and witnesses a quarrel between them; she becomes aware that Nelson’s wife knows of his affairs. Later, Nelson admits to Anna that he told his wife about their relationship; Anna is angry, feeling she has been used as a pawn in a marital dispute. She also realizes that the couple will stay together, locked in a pattern they cannot break.

She writes of another encounter she has with a journalist from Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), De Silva, who is also married. She does not like him very much, but she sleeps with him because “it didn’t matter to me” (501). When she refuses to sleep with him again, he becomes vindictive and cruel. He wants to bring another woman to Anna’s house so that he can have sex with her while Anna listens. Later, Anna dreams about De Silva, who turns into the destructive entity from her earlier nightmares. She hears that he has “abandoned his wife without money, with the two children” (503) and that he is now conducting an affair with the lover of one of his friends.

Part 6, Chapters 1-4 Analysis

As the novel progresses, Anna’s decisions as a writer—of the novel and of the notebooks—begin to take on new focus. For example, in this section, the black notebook “now fulfilled its original plan” (410), which consists of separating the “Source” content from the “Money” content. In the yellow notebook, she provides a plan for her novel-in-progress, as well as notes a newly awakening sensibility in Ella—who is, of course, a stand-in for Anna (and, concomitantly, for the author herself). In the blue notebook, Anna fleshes out this new sensibility in her arguments with her psychoanalyst and in reviewing her own dreams and destructive patterns.

The black notebook also confronts the realities—rather than the nostalgia—of death head-on. Anna describes another time at the Mashopi hotel when the group go out hunting for pigeons. The first thing they encounter is a mass of grasshoppers in a frenzy of mating. When Paul tries to “correct” the partners, coupling ones of equal size, the grasshoppers do not cooperate, and Paul crushes them: The generative impulse—grasshoppers mating—leads directly to the destructive one. The implication is that this destructive impulse is both a uniquely human impulse and one in which humans feel compelled to exert control over nature (or over other humans). When Paul launches into a discussion about the politics of Africa, what he is frustrated by is the sheer inhumanity of colonialism: “For the facts are—the facts—that there’s enough food here for everyone!—enough materials for houses for everyone!—enough talent […], I say, to create light where darkness now exists” (427). Paul and the others are impotent to prevent or correct such gross inequalities, the uneven distribution of resources inherent to the imperial project. His impotence extends even to matching grasshoppers with their right-sized mates. This impotence aligns with the theme of “Isn’t it Odd”: Modernity and the End of History, illustrating the futility of the rigid ideologies that dominated the first half of the 20th century and led to such bloodshed.

The inappropriate pairings of the grasshoppers echo the cyclical patterns of Anna and her fictionalized representative, Ella; they continue to choose emotionally and practically unavailable men, men who are married and obligated to other women and children. Ella is at odds with herself, as Anna describes it, because she “refuses to have anything to do with” normalcy, “conventionality, attitudes or emotions proper to the ‘respectable’ life” (449). Later, Anna has her character Ella express this feeling explicitly: “What’s wrong with Julia and me is quite simple: we’re being mistress figures long past the age for it” (462). This resonates with Anna’s own feelings, as she describes them to Mrs. Marks, that she—like other women of this era—is living through something new, a break with history that requires a new way of establishing identity, especially for women.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text