logo

57 pages 1 hour read

Bernhard Schlink

The Reader

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1995

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 10-17Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2, Chapter 10 Summary

As an adult, Michael doesn’t remember the discussions during Friday seminar meetings. At university, Michael uses Fridays and Saturdays to catch up on schoolwork. On Sundays, he wanders around nature. In the woods, he realizes Hanna’s secret: She can’t read or write. She ran away from the streetcar and Siemens-factory promotions because management jobs require reading and writing. She admitted to writing the report to avoid exposure; she’d rather be known as a criminal than a person without writing or reading skills. He wonders if she sent prisoners who read to her to Auschwitz to prevent them from revealing her secret.

He considers that Hanna might not have acted intentionally or surreptitiously. She incidentally wound up as a guard and, returning to Michael’s earlier conclusion, chose the readers to make their last days alive easier. Hanna isn’t crafting a narrative; she’s accepting accountability and fighting for her truth. In any case, Michael feels guilty: He loved a criminal.

Part 2, Chapter 11 Summary

The villagers can’t confirm or deny that Hanna was the leader, but the claim that Hanna was in charge makes the villagers look better. It makes it seem like they couldn’t have tried to rescue the women in the church because a menacing authority figure (Hanna) was in their way. If the guards were confused, the villagers had a chance to save the women.

Hanna is tired and doesn’t stand when she speaks anymore. The other trial participants are weary too. Michael considers telling the judge that Hanna is illiterate and that her lack of reading and writing skills compromised the integrity of the proceedings. Michael tries to discuss his dilemma with his friends. He also thinks about Hanna’s problem in different contexts and the tension between wanting to prove one’s innocence while maintaining their dignity.

Part 2, Chapter 12 Summary

Michael speaks to his father about the situation. Like his father’s students, Michael has to make an appointment. His father senses it has to do with a trial and reminds him of how upset he got when, as a little boy, his mother knew what was best for him. With kids, it’s permissible for adults to enforce their sense of what’s good, but adults have to let adults choose. Adults should have the dignity and freedom to select what they feel is the best path—happiness is irrelevant. However, Michael could try to speak to Hanna and get her to confess her illiteracy. Michael doesn’t know how he could talk to Hanna, and his father, with his back hurting, realizes he can’t help his son.

Part 2, Chapter 13 Summary

In June, the court flies to Israel for two weeks for a mix of judicial and recreational activities. Michael thinks the trip is suspicious and spends the break thinking about Hanna. He sees her by the burning church and in the camps with her prisoners and selected readers. He also sees her in her kitchen, the bathtub, and with him.

As a university student, he can’t access many images or books about the Holocaust. The world of the camps is beyond most people’s imagination. Later, as an older adult in the 1980s and 90s, the sundry Holocaust films and books help Michael and other people see what the camps were like.

Part 2, Chapter 14 Summary

Michael goes to the nearest concentration camp, the smaller Natzweiler-Struthof. He hitchhikes, and he and the driver discuss how people could murder others in the camps. They often didn’t do so out of hatred but because they were doing their jobs. The driver describes a photo he saw of a mass murder of Jews in Russia. One of the executioners smokes a cigarette and has a cheerful expression. Michael asks if the driver is the executioner, and the driver kicks him out.

Part 2, Chapter 15 Summary

As an older adult, Michael returns to Natzweiler-Struthof. It’s closed, and Michael tries to imagine the guards, prisoners, and suffering, but he can’t. He feels like a failure. Across from a restaurant, Michael spots a small house that was once a gas chamber. He doesn’t feel anything, or he doesn’t feel the way he thinks a person should feel after visiting a concentration camp.

As a university student, when Michael first visits the camp, he stays till it closes and then hitches a ride into a village, where he finds a room at an inn. He eats in the dining room, and four card-playing men throw cigarette butts at an older man with a wooden leg. Michael screams at them, but the man smashes the glass table and laughs. The card-playing men begin to laugh at Michael, and he leaves.

At night, Michael listens to the wind. He wonders if he should understand Hanna’s crime or condemn it.

Part 2, Chapter 16 Summary

Michael wonders why he doesn’t speak to Hanna or try to get her to admit she can’t read or write. He thinks about how she perceives him—as a reader or a fling— and wonders whether she would have sent him to the gas chamber.

Michael goes to the judge, and they talk about his career path before they part ways. Michael feels numb but likes the indifference—it allows him to live his regular life.

Part 2, Chapter 17 Summary

The courtroom is full of university students, schoolchildren, and journalists, so before the verdict, it’s loud. As the noise drops, Michael hears people saying, “Look.” All eyes are on Hanna. Her outfit looks like an SS uniform. The spectators think she’s mocking them, and they yell insults at her. The verdict arrives at the end of June: Hanna gets life in prison, and the other defendants receive a set number of years.

Part 2, Chapters 10-17 Analysis

Michael’s realization of Hanna’s secret reinforces the idea of fate. It’s as if something supernatural occurs in the woods that causes Michael’s epiphany: Hanna can’t read or write. To grasp her motives, Michael creates paradoxical narratives for Hanna—understanding isn’t a simple, straightforward process. He concludes, “She did not calculate and she did not maneuver” and adds, “She was not pursuing her own interests, but fighting for her own truth, her own justice” (103). Her actions during the trial symbolize honesty and integrity; she does not deny her responsibility and tries earnestly to understand her motivations. By contrast, the trial continues to symbolize distortion and manipulation. To avoid guilt, the villages advance the narrative that Hanna was the leader during the church fire. Michael says, “The existence of a leader exonerated the villagers; having failed to achieve rescue in the face of a fiercely led opposing force looked better than having failed to do anything” (105). The trial becomes a selfish exercise in dodging blame. This draws a contrast between punishment and justice. Hanna is meant to bear her guilt and everyone else’s, which means that other responsible parties dodge accountability.

Michael furthers the disreputability of the trial when he says, “I sometimes had the sense that the court had had enough, that they wanted to get the whole thing over with” (106). The trip to Israel—“a combined judicial and touristic outing” (113)—also sows doubts about the trial’s legitimacy. Ideally, the judges would want to continue the trial until they got to the truth, and they wouldn’t use the trial as a means for a partial vacation in Israel. Their ability to continue their work outside of West Germany contrasts sharply with Hanna’s circumstances, where she’s detained between court sessions.

Michael tries to gain an understanding of the concentration camps by visiting the Natzweiler-Struthof camp. This section evokes the theme of The Manipulation of Time and Memory as Michael discusses two visits to the camp: once as an adult and once during the trial. Neither trip produces much understanding or feeling, introducing the question of whether focusing on the past is enough to heal wounds and find justice.

His conversations with his father and the judge further the theme of Feelings Versus Numbness. Michael has strong feelings about the trial and Hanna’s guilt, but his father remains philosophical and detached. The judge makes “general easy chitchat” (123)—once again, a court member doesn’t appear introspective or thoughtful. Leaving the judge, Michael says:

I felt the numbness with which I had followed the horrors of the trial settling over the emotions and thoughts of the past few weeks. It would be too much to say I was happy about this. But I felt it was right. It allowed me to return to and continue to live my everyday life (124).

Numbness is a convenient way to get through the world. As a numb person, Michael doesn't have to deal with messy, intricate feelings and emotions. He can move through life the way the judges move through the trial. However, numbness seems to be covering Michael’s true emotions, as he continues to follow the trial and considers intervening on Hanna’s behalf.

The noisy courtroom creates a spectacle. People aren’t there to see justice but to witness a show or a sporting event. They shout at Hanna the way that people tend to scream insults at opposing players. This imagery reinforces that the trial is about catharsis, not justice. Hanna’s sentence doesn’t reflect the truth, and neither does the trial.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text