63 pages • 2 hours read
Jessamine ChanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In The School for Good Mothers, houses (and other types of homes) often symbolize one’s self. Rather than simply serving as a physical space, houses are symbolic of someone’s overall wellbeing, stature, and purpose. Bodies are described as “houses” insofar as they house the spirit; as such, pregnant bodies are considered houses for unborn children. According to Gust, the world could be explained as “the mind as a house living in the house of the body, living in the house of a house, living in the larger house of the town, in the larger house of the state, in the houses of America and society and the universe” (13). Frida uses houses to explore her grief over her divorce, resentment of Susanna, and dream of a better future with Tucker.
At the novel’s beginning, Frida compares her current house to the old one she shared with Gust, which was larger, with better furniture and better “energy.” She resents that Gust and Susanna now have this furniture in their apartment, along with other elaborate displays of Susanna’s wealth and bourgeois aesthetic. Later, Frida daydreams about having a new house with Tucker, a fantasy in which all her emotional problems are solved, demonstrated through the house’s appearance: “The light will blaze through windows the way it only ever does in movies. Every room flooded with brightness” (257). The light in the house symbolizes hope, fulfillment, and the return of the parents’ children, recalling Director Ms. Knight’s promise at the beginning of the program, that their children were the “light at the end of the tunnel” (84). Frida recognizes this house as a fantasy and yet, it is the only way she can imagine herself in a happy situation.
Throughout the novel, the spaces where “bad” parents live, work, and go to “school” are compared to prisons in order to capture the dystopian surveillance of parents and their resulting self-policing. These spaces are not actual prison buildings; rather, Child Protective Services (CPS) transforms other spaces into prisons, for the alleged purposes of protecting children from abuse and neglect. CPS installs cameras throughout Frida’s home to monitor her behavior and track her emotions. Frida’s home becomes a prison because she has to spend enough time there to appear normal, while also policing her behavior and not displaying excessive negative emotions despite the nightmarish reality around her.
Later, Frida and other mothers attend “school” at an old, bankrupt liberal arts college campus that has been transformed into a prison. Although the campus retains its beautiful buildings and arboretums, it’s surrounded by barbed wire fences and vast expanses of unforgiving wilderness so escaping without the help of a guard is not feasible. Although one mother, Helen, is allowed to quit the program after the first day, the rules soon change and the women are kept on the premises.
There are several other similarities to prison: The women are ordered by a judge to attend the program, otherwise forfeit any chance of regaining custody. Guards are omnipresent, hygienic conditions are lacking, contact with the outside world is severely limited, and abuse is prevalent. No visitors are allowed, and the mothers’ weekly 10-minute phone calls are revoked, often without explanation, for most. The mothers are forbidden from sharing information about the program with others (and if they do, they automatically lose custody), allowing the staff to do anything without consequences. The women wear uniforms, perform labor (such as cleaning the school, taking care of the grounds, and cooking for each other) with no pay, and have other restrictions beyond what are placed on normal citizens, such as not being allowed to drink alcohol or have romances. There is an excessive amount of racial and class-based tension, most of which is created by the institution itself, which its “inmates” (and dolls) then respond to in kind.
In addition to illustrating the plight of parents who have had their children removed and are thus treated like criminals, the school’s resemblance to prison highlights the potential failure of actual prisons. The school’s conditions are supposed to help the mothers become “good mothers”—however, most of them do not learn whatever it is they are supposed to learn, and therefore do not regain custody. Along the way, they get abused, traumatized, physically injured, and some even die. When Frida gets out, she has nothing, so she experiences a downward spiral and resorts to kidnapping, which will land her in actual prison. This is an example of how the prison system often fails people, creating a spiral or pattern of crime rather than rehabilitating inmates.
Dolls often symbolize real children in literature, due to their appearance as well as their function as a children’s toy that teaches them how to “take care” of smaller, more vulnerable “people.” In the novel, this notion becomes more complex because the “dolls” in question are actually A. I. robots, and are far more similar to real children than the inanimate objects that children play with. When Frida was pregnant, “her mother said that having a daughter would be like having her own real doll” (291); later, Frida uses the Mandarin term of endearment wawa (“little doll”) for her doll, Emmanuelle. Whereas comparing a doll to a child has a humanizing effect, comparing a child to a doll has a dehumanizing effect and becomes a dangerous metaphor, especially with the introduction of the A. I. dolls, who are neither humans nor dolls.
It’s dangerous to compare a real baby to a doll because this diminishes the baby’s needs and oversimplifies what a baby is. When the school applies this same metaphor to the robots, the same danger is at play. Although the mothers see the dolls as “real,” the instructors do not, having no moral qualms with abusing them or wiping their memories at the year’s end. It’s also dangerous to compare a doll to a real child, because the school’s dolls do not provide the relevant education needed for parenthood, given differences such as dolls not requiring nutrients and having an “off” button.