logo

42 pages 1 hour read

Anton Chekhov

The Seagull

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1895

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

The Seagull

The literal story of the seagull in the play, which inspires Trigorin to write a fictionalized version of it, is a metaphor for Nina’s character arc. It symbolizes her transformation from a beautiful, free spirit living by the lake to a woman destroyed by a man out of boredom. The parallel is drawn between the two from Nina’s first appearance. One of her first lines in the play is to Konstantin, when she tells him her father and his wife refuse to allow her to visit Sorin’s estate. She says, “They’re terrified I’ll go on the stage. But I’m drawn here like a seagull drawn to the lake” (7, emphasis added). From the beginning, there is a sense of curiosity and an overshadowing presence of impending danger that is coming her way.

Later, Nina sneaks away for longer and is relieved of the fear of being caught. Sorin teases her, saying, “We’re all smiles because Papa and Stepmama have gone away and we are now free as a bird for three whole days” (23). It is during this time when Nina is “free” that she becomes enchanted with Trigorin and loses interest in Konstantin. It is in these three days that she forms a romantic relationship with a man who will ultimately lead to her demise.

Trigorin himself compares Nina to the seagull that Konstantin shoots and brings to Nina as a symbol of what he will soon do to himself. Instead of being frightened by the dead creature, Trigorin admires it. He says to Nina, “Beautiful bird. I really don’t want to leave. What if you were to persuade Irina to stay?” (35-36). It is in this moment that Trigorin decides he wishes to have Nina for himself. He begins to write down an idea about a story of a young girl like Nina. He tells her, “She loves the lake like a seagull and is happy and free just like a seagull. Then a man happens to come along, he sees her, and having nothing much to do, destroys her, like this seagull” (36, emphasis added). Anton Chekhov uses Trigorin’s short story to foreshadow what he will do to Nina later in the play. Trigorin does not literally kill her the way Konstantin kills the seagull, but when she leaves all she knows behind to go to Moscow, he impregnates her, then abandons her when the baby dies, leaving her to mourn their child alone and to suffer a career on the stage she was not truly ready for yet.

Finally, in the last Act of the play it is revealed that Trigorin asked to have the seagull stuffed. When the group gathers to be with the ailing Sorin, Shamraev mentions that the stuffed bird is still on the property. After Nina and Konstantin leave the study and the rest of the group bursts in, Shamraev pulls it out from the cabinet. This is significant for a few reasons. First, it is significant because Trigorin asked for it to be stuffed in the first place in a morbid parallel to his objectification of Nina. Secondly, the fact that it was in Konstantin’s study, hidden away, represents the idea that he too had his feelings for her locked away, as is proven when he reveals that he has been following her to every performance and watching from a distance. Nina is no longer the beautiful free woman she was at the beginning of the play, yet she has been frozen as an object of affection, perfectly preserved and not allowed to change in the minds of the men who love, covet, and destroy her. 

The Lake

The lake is symbolic of the dreams and illusions of grandeur that most of the characters have in The Seagull. The lake represents the tensions between country life versus town life, providing a beautiful and sometimes mysterious backdrop for love and longing. Arkadina remembers fondly how, “[a] dozen years ago you could have heard music and singing from across the water almost every evening […] There was laughter—noise—gunfire…and the love affairs, love affairs going on all the time” (15). The lake is not just a place of art and enchantment during the timeline of The Seagull, but also during the years leading up to the events of the play.

The dreaminess of the lake is not always positive, however. When Masha confesses her love for Konstantin to Dorn, he cries out, “Another one! They’re all such sensitive creatures! […] And [there’s] all this love about!—It’s that lake!—they’re all bewitched!” (21). Dorn is, ironically, the subject of another unrequited love himself—that of Masha’s mother, Polina. Arkadina, too, grows to find the lake less lovely than at first when Konstantin begins to disappear to the lake for hours on end. She laments, “Will somebody tell me what is the matter with my son? Why is he so boring and churlish? He spends every day on the lake, I hardly see him” (24). The lake is a place of imagination and peace, but just as one can get stuck in the dreaminess of country life and never face the realities beyond, the lake represents what happens when dreams stay just that, and never become actions.

At the end of the play, “[t]here’re waves on the lake. Really big ones” (52). The waters are choppy and stormy, foreshadowing the dashed dreams that are to come for the characters in the play. Dreams can be beautiful and inspiring, but a dream left unfulfilled or that becomes disillusioning can have dire consequences, just as a lake has potential for both stillness and danger. 

Life in the Country

The motif of life in the country reinforces (and indeed, bridges) two of the themes in The Seagull: The Consequences of Disillusionment and Living in the Shadow of a Renowned Parent. The characters in the play often begrudge being stuck in the country while also loving the escape from reality it provides. There is a constant conflict between characters being drawn to town, but remaining in the country, or vice versa. Leaving and returning to the country represents the action, or inaction, of characters as they choose to pursue their dreams or to let them remain unfulfilled.

Sorin is an example of someone who dreams of a life beyond the country. He says, “the country somehow doesn’t agree with me and never will, that’s that and there you have it” (2). Even though he is unhappy, he never does anything to change his situation. He stays in the country where dreams are possible, but the reality of them is not. Staying in the country and complaining about what could have been is his way of avoiding the disappointment of pursuing one’s dreams and having them fail.

While he is afraid to act on his own dreams, Sorin advocates for Konstantin to act on his own. He stands up for Konstantin, saying, “[H]e’s an intelligent young fellow, buried in the country […] he has nothing to do and he’s ashamed of it and frightened by it” (40). Sorin acknowledges that Konstantin needs to have access to the people and benefits of a town life, like the one Arkadina has, if he is to fulfill his dreams of being a writer. Konstantin ends up straddling the two worlds: He frequently leaves the country to follow Nina from performance to performance, and his stories are published and regarded by others in town. However, he always returns to the country, never fully escaping the dreamy, in-between world that has been built there.

Arkadina, in contrast, does act on her dream and becomes a star in town. She thrives off the crowd’s praises, “but here in the country this drug is not available so she gets bored and crochety” (4). Even though she becomes disillusioned as she ages, she was able to achieve her goal of becoming a famous actress by leaving the country. Arkadina is a woman of action, and the country is a place of passivity, so the two are inherently at odds when they come into contact with one another.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text