logo

15 pages 30 minutes read

Octavio Paz

Wind, Water, Stone

Fiction | Poem | Adult | Published in 1979

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

The Elements: Wind, Water, and Stone

The elements wind, water, and stone make up the bulk of the poem’s subject matter, diction, structural patterns, and title. Because the poem is built on a skeletal structure of these words, including (but not limited to) their continual rearrangement as a closing refrain for each stanza, they function as structural motifs. However, they also contain symbolic meaning. In the poem, water “hollows,” “escapes,” and “murmurs” (Lines 1, 7, 10). Wind, on the other hand, “scatters,” “carves,” and “sings” (Lines 2, 5, 9), while stone “stops,” “[is] a cup,” and “keeps still” (Lines 3, 6, 11). Each element is presented in the poem as an embodiment (or symbol) of a certain kind of sensibility. Water is active, gently talkative, and seeks escape; wind freely scatters and sings; and stone remains steadfastly inert. Paz presents the elements to his readers in anthropomorphic terms, demonstrating that their respective essences are inextricably tied with their human-attributed “empty names” (Line 15).

In this way, the three elements also function as symbols of a broader theory presented in the poem. While they serve as examples of how natural forces are given identity and individual essence only through human perception and the categorical work of language, they point in turn to the way this logic extends to all things. Paz’s poem reveals that the basic features of landscape are separate only by means of human perception and categorization, but the poem’s larger suggestion is that all things are individuated only through these artificial means as well. With this reading in mind, each of the three elements acts in part as a symbol for identity as a whole, for individuated linguistic essences in general.

Nature

While Paz uses wind, water, and stone as symbols for a broader critique of individuation in general, reading them only as such skips an important step in the poem’s concerns. After all, each of these elements is an archetypal part of nature in general.

Nature is a classic and common theme and symbol in poetry, so a poem that reflects on nature invites itself into discussion with a long history of nature poems. Paz’s postmodern poem engages with this tradition even as it subverts it. The elements, acting as synecdoche (when a part of something represents the whole) for Nature at large, usher in a poetic celebration of nature as such. However, as the final stanza affirms, Nature acts as a symbol for all manner of experiences and categories in the universe. Nature both “is another and no other,” held together only by its “empty [name]” (Lines 13, 15). In the same way, all identity and individuated unities are artificially held together, according to Paz’s poem.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text